But I just dont see how knowing eschatology helps me love Jesus more the plaintive voice sounds more and more from the evangelical church. If 晩晩当際際夊消消夊2023 Torrey grad, Matthew Anderson is the spokesman for his crowd of younger evangelicals he claims, then eschatology for this group is indeed something their parents got way out of balance and should be dumped in lieu of more attention to working out Jesus reign in the world now.[1] Ouch thats talking about my generation (or maybe my fathers [?!]). But there is some truth to the charge, I must admit. I mean I havent been to a good prophecy conference in decades! Still, there is more to eschatology than the dumpster merits, especially if we aim to be about Jesus reign in the present, which we should.

The topic is work. Something important for all of us, and its one that has interested me in particular teaching already five years now a theology of work course for 晩晩当際際夊消消夊2023s Crowell School of Business MBA program. Work is also a topic that naturally engages the desire for kingdom impact in the culture, because, as Karl Barth says, human culture is produced in work.[2] So the Faith and Work movement is right on target for engaging a ready audience in a worthy endeavor. This of course isnt the only good of theology of work. This relatively new domain for theological reflection has helped me tons to think better about the sources and consequences of a stubborn sacred-secular division of labor we still embrace that robs the Church of virtually 90% of its missional strength because what we do Sunday leaves people thinking what they do Monday doesnt count for God or it counts less. Ive learned better a doctrine of calling and vocation and the intrinsic value of work to just being a human being its part of the image of God, after all! Check it out in the story you dont have to go long before Adam and Eve, as the image of God, are mandated work to do (Gen 1:26-28; see also 2:5 and 15).

And speaking of the Bibles Story, Adam and Eve and human mandates, Ive also seen how ones telling of the Bibles Story, including its ending (thats eschatology folks!) impacts how one sees the meaning of work in the present. Indeed, every one of the books Ive encountered every one that go at work through a biblical lens, telling the story of work from Genesis to Revelation operate with the same version of the Story the same eschatology, and derive similar conclusions for our work.

Book Cover of "The God of Israel and Christian Theology" by SoulenThat version of the Story R. Kendall Soulen, in his insightful book, The God of Israel and Christian Theology (Fortress, 1994), calls the traditional narrative, and its familiar to us all. It has 4 episodes: creation, fall, redemption in Christ, and re-creation/consummation (Heaven). We use this narrative all the time to systematize everything from the Gospel, to christology, to soteriology, to anthropology, to everything. But Soulen asks, Is this the right narrativeor is something missing? His frank answer comes off a little bracing: you dont need 2/3 of the Bible to tell this version of the Story. Put that way, it just sounds like something is out of whack with the traditional approach. Uh, Houston, we have a problem.

In the book, Soulen will detail the consequences for Christian theology of not attending to Israels place in the Storypast, but especially future as laid out by the prophets. It truncates christology making Jesus the incarnation of the eternal Logos, not the incarnation of the God of Israel; it reduces salvation to the Christ the Lord of hearts rather than His being the Lord of nations also. And etc. For work, better attention to the Old Testament means a better chance to leverage meaning for human work beyond the usual redemptive, God traces, foreshadowing of Heaven, or soul work most accounts resign our work to now. Andy Crouchs hugely popular and award winning book, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling (InterVarsity, 2008), and more recent to me, Tom Nelsons very well done, Work Matters: Connecting Sunday Worship to Monday Work (Crossway, 2011) both conclude this way for work.[3] Crouch even dedicates an entire chapter to Why We Cant Change the World.

So this is the end hope for our work? Do your best, but really, its about hanging on for Heaven?

Missing from this account is a Story for work a different eschatology would offer. Missing is the robust Israelite hope of the prophets for human work that one day will bring a bona fide God-culture to this world not Heaven, but this world under the patronage of a returned and visible Messianic Servant/Prince. Missing is the Story where human work actually solves the worlds problems of injustice, poverty, scarcity, and war, instead of toiling under them. Missing is an account for work that accomplishes humanitys original mandate to expand Edens order to the whole earth by our work, as many biblical theologians are rightly reading Genesis 1-2 these days (e.g., G.K. Beale and Mitchel Kim, God Dwells Among Us: Expanding Eden to the Ends of the Earth [IVP, 2014]). A human ruling and subduing that actually extended the order of Edens Garden to the whole earth, in spite of the presence of a hostile foe, is what it means to be in Gods image in the first creation narrative (Gen. 1:26-28). Its what is held as a full-throated hope to us in the last narrative too (Rev. 2:25-27 and Rev. 20:5), and Israels Story still holds this as the hope for human work in this world once Jesus returns for the reward of his sufferings.

In the meantime, yes, work suffers under this worlds system still energized by the so-called god of this age (2 Cor. 4:4). We suffer and groan in our creative culture-making enterprises, and we may never get out alive before Jesus return. But that is not the end for our work this side of Heaven. No, Israels hope is still the worlds hope and that eschatology says our works achievements, our increases of knowledge, discovery and service for the common good of our fellow man will one day contribute to a culture that dominates and rules evil, injustice, inequality, and scarcity Gods way. Now theres a hope for work to believe in.


[1] Matthew Lee Anderson, The New Evangelical Scandal, The City 1 (2008): 48-65.

[2] Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics 3.4.

[3] And by the way, both are worth the time of a close reading.